CDD reglementés: Oui

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ The Ordinance does not use the term “fixed-term contract”. However, it regulates temporary employment and contract workers, which function similarly to fixed-term arrangements.
⫸ SCHEDULE STANDING ORDERS [S.O.] of the ICEO
→ S.O. 1, Clause (g) defines a contract worker as: A workman who works on a contract basis for a specific period of remuneration to be calculated on a piece rate basis.

Motifs autorisés de recours au CDD: aucune limitation

Remarks

The definitions of permanent, temporary workers and badli imply that temporary workers or badli cannot be hired to undertake permanent work (SO 1 ICEO). They can only be hired to undertake work of a temporary nature:
- "Permanent workers" are those who are engaged in work of a permanent nature likely to last more than nine months and has satisfactorily completed a probationary period of three months [...] and includes a badli who has been employed for a continuous period of three months or for one hundred and eighty-three days during any period of twelve consecutive months.
- "Temporary workers" are those who have been engaged for work of an essentially temporary nature that is likely to be finished within a period not exceeding nine months.
- A "badli" is a woker who is appointed in the post of a permanent worker or probationer, who is temporarily absent.

Nombre maximum de CDD successifs: aucune limitation

Remarks

The ICEO does not expressly refers to the renewals of FTCs.
It only provides that temporary workers cannot be hired for more than 9 months.

Durée cumulée maximum de CDD successifs: aucune limitation

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ The Ordinance does not prescribe a maximum cumulative duration for temporary or contract employment. However, a worker engaged continuously for more than nine months on work of a permanent nature may be considered for classification as a permanent workman under the Schedule (S.O. 1, Clause (b).

Notes / Remarques

Notes

▷ Note: The Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968, classifies workers into different categories (permanent, probationer, badli, temporary, apprentice, and contract worker). Protection against arbitrary termination and entitlement to notice and severance pay vary significantly depending on the worker’s classification.

Durée maximale de la période d'essai (en mois): 3 mois

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ The three-month probationary period is set out in the Schedule to the Ordinance (S.O. 1, Clause (c)).
⫸ SCHEDULE STANDING ORDERS [S.O.] of the ICEO
→ S.O. 1, Clause (c) provides that: A "probationer" is a workman who is provisionally employed to fill a permanent vacancy in a post and has not completed three months’ service therein. If a permanent employee is employed as a probationer in a higher post, he may, at any time during the probationary period of three months, be reverted to his old permanent post.

Excluded from protection against dismissal: Oui

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
▷ Temporary workmen, probationers, and badlis have limited protection against termination compared to permanent workmen.
⫸ SCHEDULE STANDING ORDERS [S.O.] of the ICEO
→ S.O. 1, Clause (e) defines a temporary workman as: A workman who has been engaged for work which is of an essentially temporary nature likely to be finished within a period not exceeding nine months.
→ S.O. 12(2) provides that no temporary workman, probationer, or badli is entitled to notice if their services are terminated by the employer.

Obligation d'informer le travailleur des raisons du licenciement: Oui

Motifs autorisés (licenciement justifié):

Remarks

Motifs prohibés: congé de matérnité, affiliation et activités syndicales

Remarks

▶ Federal Ombudsperson for Protection against Harassment of Women at the Workplace (FOSPAH)
→ In Zainab Zahrah Awan vs Embrace IT (Final Order dated 20 October 2025), the Federal Ombudsperson held that terminating a woman during approved maternity leave constitutes gender-based discrimination under Section 2(h) of the Protection against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act, 2010 (as amended).
→ The Ombudsperson further held that such termination violates constitutional protections under Articles 14, 25 and 37 of the Constitution of Pakistan (dignity, equality, and protection of motherhood) and is contrary to the Maternity and Paternity Leave Act, 2023.
→ The termination order was declared null and void.
▶ Industrial Relations Act, 2012 [IRA]
▷ The IRA prohibits employers from engaging in unfair labour practices, including dismissal or other prejudicial treatment on the ground of trade union membership or activities.
→ Section 17 IRA provides that: Save with the prior permission of the Registrar, no officer or member of a trade union of workmen shall be transferred, discharged, dismissed or otherwise punished during the pendency of an application for registration of the trade union with the Registrar, provided that the union has notified the names of its officers and members to the employer in writing.
→ Under section 31(1)(d) IRA, No employer or trade union of employers and no person acting on behalf of either shall, (…), dismiss, discharge, remove from employment or transfer or threaten to dismiss, discharge or remove from employment or transfer a workman or injure or threaten to injure him in respect of his employment by reason that the workman:
(i) is or proposes to become, or seeks to persuade any other person to become, a member or officer of a trade union; or
(ii) participates in the promotion, formation or activities of a trade union.

Travailleurs bénéficiant d'une protection particulière: représentants des travailleurs, femmes enceintes ou en congé de maternité

Remarks

▶ Federal Ombudsperson for Protection against Harassment of Women at the Workplace (FOSPAH)
→ In Zainab Zahrah Awan vs Embrace IT (Final Order dated 20 October 2025), the Federal Ombudsperson ruled that women on maternity leave enjoy special protection against dismissal.
→ Termination of employment during the period of approved maternity leave was held to constitute gender-based discrimination and was declared null and void.
→ The decision reinforces that pregnant women and women on maternity leave are entitled to protection against dismissal under the Protection against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act, 2010, the Maternity and Paternity Leave Act, 2023, and the Constitution of Pakistan.
▶ Industrial Relations Act, 2012 [IRA]
→ Sections 17 and 31(1)(d) IRA protect workers against dismissal or other adverse action on the grounds of trade union membership or participation in trade union activities. This protection extends to trade union office bearers and representatives.

Forme de la notification du licenciement au travailleur: écrite

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ Standing Order 12 requires that termination of employment must be effected through a written order that explicitly states the reason for the action taken.
→ S.O. 12(3) provides that: The services of a workman shall not be terminated, nor shall a workman be removed, retrenched, discharged or dismissed from service, except by an order in writing which shall explicitly state the reason for the action taken.

Délai de préavis:

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ Standing Order 12 requires one month’s notice (or pay in lieu) for the termination of a permanent workman for any reason other than misconduct.
→ S.O. 12(1) provides that: For terminating employment of a permanent workman, for any reason other than misconduct, one month’s notice shall be given either by the employer or the workman. One month’s wages, calculated on the basis of average wages earned by the workman during the last three months, shall be paid in lieu of notice.
▷ Exception
→ According to S.O. 12(2), no notice period applies in the case of termination of a probationer, badli, or temporary workman (whether monthly-rated, weekly-rated, daily-rated, or piece-rated).

ancienneté ≥ 6 mois:

  • travailleurs permanents: 1 mois.

ancienneté ≥ 9 mois:

  • travailleurs permanents: 1 mois.

ancienneté ≥ 2 ans:

  • travailleurs permanents: 1 mois.

ancienneté ≥ 4 ans:

  • travailleurs permanents: 1 mois.

ancienneté ≥ 5 ans:

  • travailleurs permanents: 1 mois.

ancienneté ≥ 10 ans:

  • travailleurs permanents: 1 mois.

ancienneté ≥ 20 ans:

  • travailleurs permanents: 1 mois.

Indemnité compensatrice de préavis: Oui

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ Under S.O. 12(1), the employer may terminate the employment of a permanent workman by paying one month’s wages in lieu of notice.

Notification à l'administration publique: Non

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ There is no statutory requirement to notify the public administration in cases of individual dismissal.

Notification aux représentants des travailleurs: Non

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ There is no general statutory requirement to notify workers’ representatives before carrying out an individual dismissal.

Autorisation de l'administration publique ou d'un organe judiciaire: Non

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ No prior approval from any public authority or judicial body is required for individual dismissals.

Accord des représentants des travailleurs: Non

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ No approval from workers’ representatives is required for individual dismissals.

Définition du licenciement collectif (nombre d'employés concernés) → S.O. 11 A indicates that: Notwithstanding anything contained in Standing Order 11, no employer shall terminate employment of more than fifty per cent of the workmen or close down the whole of the establishment without prior permission of the Labour Court in this behalf, except in the event of fire, catastrophe, stoppage of power supply, epidemics or civil commotion.

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ The Ordinance does not provide a general definition of collective dismissal. However, Standing Order 11-A imposes specific procedural requirements when an employer intends to terminate the employment of more than 50% of the workmen or close down the whole establishment.

Notification à l'administration publique No

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ There is no statutory requirement for prior consultation with trade unions before retrenchment or closure.

Notification aux syndicats (représentants des travailleurs) No

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ There is no general requirement to notify the public administration. However, under Standing Order 11-A, prior permission of the Labour Court is required in cases of large-scale termination or closure (see below).

Notification aux représentants des travailleurs: No

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ There is no statutory requirement to notify workers’ representatives before implementing retrenchment or closure.

Accord des syndicats (représentants des travailleurs) Yes

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ Under S.O. 11-A, an employer cannot terminate the employment of more than 50% of the workmen or close down the whole establishment without obtaining prior permission from the Labour Court, except in cases of fire, catastrophe, stoppage of power supply, epidemics, or civil commotion.
→ Standing Order 11-A provides that: Notwithstanding anything contained in Standing Order 11, no employer shall terminate employment of more than fifty per cent of the workmen or close down the whole of the establishment without prior permission of the Labour Court in this behalf, except in the event of fire, catastrophe, stoppage of power supply, epidemics or civil commotion.

Accord des représentants des travailleurs No

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ No approval from workers’ representatives is required.

Règles de priorité pour l'ordre des des licenciements collectifs (situation sociale, âge, ancienneté) Yes

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ Standing Order requires the employer to follow the “last come, first go” principle when retrenching workers.
→ S.O. 13 indicates that: Where any workman is to be retrenched, and he belongs to a particular category of workmen, the employer shall retrench the workman who is the last person employed in that category.

Obligation de l'employeur d'examiner des solutions alternatives au licenciement (transferts, formation...) Yes

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
▷ Standing Order grants retrenched workers priority for re-employment for one year.
→ S.O. 14 states that: Where any number of workmen are retrenched and the employer proposes to take into his employ any person within a period of one year from the date of such retrenchment, he shall give an opportunity to the retrenched workmen belonging to the category concerned, by sending a notice by registered post to their last known addresses to offer themselves for re-employment, and they shall have preference over other persons each having priority according to the length of his service under the employer.

Règles de priorité de réembauche No

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ There is no statutory requirement to consider alternatives to retrenchment.

Severance pay:

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ Under Standing Order 12, a worker whose employment is terminated for any reason other than misconduct is entitled to gratuity (treated as severance pay) equivalent to 30 days’ wages for every completed year of service or any part thereof in excess of six months.
→ S.O. 12(6) provides that: Where a workman resigns from service or his services are terminated by the employer, for any reason other than misconduct, he shall … be paid gratuity equivalent to thirty days’ wages … for every completed year of service or any part thereof in excess of six months.
▻ However, if the employer has established a "Provident Fund" to which the worker is a contributor and the employer’s contribution is not less than that of the worker, no gratuity is payable for the period during which such a "Provident Fund" has existed.

tenure ≥ 6 mois: 30 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 9 mois: 30 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 1 an: 30 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 2 ans: 60 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 4 ans: 120 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 5 ans: 150 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 10 ans: 300 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 20 ans: 600 jour(s).

Redundancy payment:

Remarks

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ There is no separate provision for redundancy pay. Termination for economic reasons (retrenchment) is covered under the general rules of Standing Order 12(6), and the same gratuity applies.

tenure ≥ 6 mois: 30 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 9 mois: 30 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 1 an: 30 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 2 ans: 60 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 4 ans: 120 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 5 ans: 150 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 10 ans: 300 jour(s).

tenure ≥ 20 ans: 600 jour(s).

Notes

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ The provisions relating to gratuity (severance pay) under Standing Order 12(6) do not apply to establishments employing not more than 49 persons during the preceding twelve months, unless extended by government notification (Section 1(4) ICEO).

travailleurs miniers: Oui

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ Remedies for wrongful termination are available through the Labour Court. A worker whose services are terminated without just cause may claim reinstatement or compensation.
→ Section 7(6) ICEO provides that offences under the Ordinance shall be tried exclusively by a Labour Court, indicating that: No Court other than a Labour Court established under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 (XXIII of 1969), shall try any offence under this Ordinance.

: Non

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ While Standing Order 12(6) provides for gratuity (30 days’ wages per year of service), this is a statutory minimum benefit payable upon termination (except for misconduct) and is distinct from compensation awarded specifically for unfair dismissal.
→ The Labour Court has discretion to determine appropriate compensation (which may include back wages, damages, or a lump sum in lieu of reinstatement). No maximum limit is prescribed by law.

Non

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ While Standing Order 12(6) provides for gratuity (30 days’ wages per year of service), this is a statutory minimum benefit payable upon termination (except for misconduct) and is distinct from compensation awarded specifically for unfair dismissal.
→ The Labour Court has discretion to determine appropriate compensation (which may include back wages, damages, or a lump sum in lieu of reinstatement). No maximum limit is prescribed by law.

Compensation pour licenciement injustifié - limites légales (plafond en mois ou methode de calcul définie):

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
→ The only fixed statutory benefit available upon termination (other than for misconduct) is gratuity under S.O. 12(6), calculated as: Thirty days’ wages for every completed year of service or any part thereof in excess of six months.
▷ Note: This is not considered compensation for unfair dismissal, but rather a statutory severance benefit.

directeurs /cadres dirigeants: Oui

▶ Industrial Relations Act, 2012
→ Reinstatement is one of the remedies available through the Labour Court in cases of unfair dismissal or victimization, particularly where the dismissal violates Section 17 of the Act (unfair labour practices).

police: Oui

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
  → The ICEO does not contain any explicit provision regarding mandatory conciliation.
▶ Industrial Relations Act, 2012 [IRA]
→ Before a dispute is referred to a Labour Court or arbitration, the parties are generally required to go through conciliation proceedings.
→ Sections 37 and 38 of the IRA establish the procedure for conciliation in industrial disputes.
Note: While the Labour Court has jurisdiction over disputes arising from termination of employment, the mechanisms of conciliation and arbitration under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 are primarily designed for industrial disputes, including those involving trade unions. These procedures are most relevant in cases where the worker alleges victimization or unfair labour practices under Section 17 of the Act. For ordinary individual dismissals not linked to trade union activities, the Standing Orders Ordinance, 1968, remains the principal legislation.

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
▷ Disputes arising from the Standing Orders, including those related to termination of employment, fall under the jurisdiction of the Labour Court.
▷ Note: The ICEO only provides that offences under the Ordinance shall be tried by a Labour Court. The broader civil jurisdiction of the Labour Court over termination disputes derives mainly from the Industrial Relations legislation.
→ Section 7(6) ICEO indicates that: (6) No Court other than a Labour Court established under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 (XXIII of 1969), shall try any offence under this Ordinance.

Règlement des litiges individuels par arbitrage: Oui

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
  → The ICEO does not contain any statutory provision regarding arbitration.
▶ Industrial Relations Act, 2012 [IRA]
→ Where conciliation fails, the parties may refer the dispute to an arbitrator. The arbitrator’s award is final and binding on the parties.
→ Section 40 IRA indicates that: If the conciliation fails, the Conciliator shall try to persuade the parties to agree to refer the dispute to an arbitrator. In case the parties agree, they shall make a joint request in writing for reference of the dispute to an arbitrator agreed upon by them.
Note: While the Labour Court has jurisdiction over disputes arising from termination of employment, the mechanisms of conciliation and arbitration under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 are primarily designed for industrial disputes, including those involving trade unions. These procedures are most relevant in cases where the worker alleges victimization or unfair labour practices under Section 17 of the Act. For ordinary individual dismissals not linked to trade union activities, the Standing Orders Ordinance, 1968, remains the principal legislation.

Durée de la procédure:

▶ Industrial Relations Act, 2012 [IRA]
No general statutory time limit exists for proceedings before the Labour Court in unfair dismissal cases. However, when a dispute is referred to arbitration, the arbitrator must deliver the award within 30 days (§ 40 IRA), unless the parties agree otherwise.

▶ Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 [ICEO]
▷ The ICEO does not contain any explicit provision regarding the burden of proof in cases of termination of employment.
▶ Industrial Relations Act, 2012 [IRA]
▷ The IRA also does not contain a general statutory provision that expressly shifts the burden of proof to the employer in unfair dismissal cases.
→ The only reference to the burden of proof is in section 77 of the IRA, which deals only with the criminal liability of directors, managers, and officers of a company when the company commits an offence under the Act. It creates a reverse burden of proof in criminal proceedings against those individuals.

▷ No information was found in the examined materials in this respect.